Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Pada Gugatan Penggugat Eror in Persona Dalam Perkara Perjanjian Pembiayaan Multiguna Dengan Penyerahan Secara Fidusia
Abstract
The explanation in Law No. 42 of 1999, stipulates that every fiduciary guarantee must be officially registered with the Fiduciary Guarantee Registration Office. If the fiduciary guarantee is not registered, then the fiduciary guarantee does not have executorial power. There is a lawsuit case alleging that the defendant has committed a breach of contract on a multipurpose financing agreement with a fiduciary delivery guarantee in decision No. 4/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN Kot between PT Woori Finance Indonesia Tbk against Azimi and Rosida.
In deciding the case, the judge in evaluating the Plaintiff's case is considered untenable, because it relies on the evaluation of documentary evidence presented in the form of photocopies, without the original document whose authenticity has never been shown. legal principle: when submitting a 'photocopy of a letter' as court evidence, the photocopy version must be authenticated to match the original document. So this is used as the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding this case
Keywords
Judge's Consideration; Error in Persona; Multipurpose Agreement; Fiduciary
References
Soersono. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, PT Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Kadek Cinthya Dwi Lestari. 2020. Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Terdaftar, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Vol 2, No 3,
Ismail Koto. 2021. Penerapan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pada Benda Bergerak Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi, Journal Of Education, Humaniora And Social Sciences, Vol 4 No 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v10i1.3848
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 217 times
PDF : 86 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Tami Rusli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Indexed by :
Abstract
The explanation in Law No. 42 of 1999, stipulates that every fiduciary guarantee must be officially registered with the Fiduciary Guarantee Registration Office. If the fiduciary guarantee is not registered, then the fiduciary guarantee does not have executorial power. There is a lawsuit case alleging that the defendant has committed a breach of contract on a multipurpose financing agreement with a fiduciary delivery guarantee in decision No. 4/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN Kot between PT Woori Finance Indonesia Tbk against Azimi and Rosida.
In deciding the case, the judge in evaluating the Plaintiff's case is considered untenable, because it relies on the evaluation of documentary evidence presented in the form of photocopies, without the original document whose authenticity has never been shown. legal principle: when submitting a 'photocopy of a letter' as court evidence, the photocopy version must be authenticated to match the original document. So this is used as the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding this case
Keywords
Judge's Consideration; Error in Persona; Multipurpose Agreement; Fiduciary
References
Soersono. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, PT Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Kadek Cinthya Dwi Lestari. 2020. Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Terdaftar, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Vol 2, No 3,
Ismail Koto. 2021. Penerapan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pada Benda Bergerak Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi, Journal Of Education, Humaniora And Social Sciences, Vol 4 No 2.

Justicia Sains : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
