Disparitas Pidana pada Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan
Abstract
Discussion of criminal acts in community life is often a very interesting study, especially related to the disparity in criminal decisions handed down. The problem in this study is how is the responsibility of the perpetrators of embezzlement based on Decision Number 452 / Pid.B / 2023 / PN.Tjk, Decision Number 745 / Pid.B / 2022 / PN.Tjk and Decision Number 807 / Pid.B / 2022 / PN.Tjk? and how is the disparity in criminal sentences in court decisions regarding the responsibility of perpetrators of embezzlement based on Decision Number 452 / Pid.B / 2023 / PN.Tjk, Decision Number 745 / Pid.B / 2022 / PN.Tjk and Decision Number 807 / Pid.B / 2022 / PN.Tjk? The problem approach used in this study consists of a normative legal approach and an empirical legal approach. The types of data used are primary data and secondary data. Data analysis was carried out using a qualitative descriptive method.
The disparity in criminal sentences in court decisions regarding the responsibility of perpetrators of embezzlement based on Decision Number 452/Pid.B/2023/PN.Tjk, Decision Number 745/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tjk and Decision Number 807/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tjk there was injustice in the verdicts imposed because the Articles and levels of losses incurred by the defendant were not the same, and the sentences imposed were different and would give rise to various perceptions in society about justice itself
Keywords
Sentencing, Court Decisions and disparity
Full Text:
PDF
References
Muladi, 2001, Dampak Disparitas Pidana dan Usaha Mengatasinya, Alumni, Bandung.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.
Natangsa Surbakti, 2012, Filsafat Hukum, BPFH UMS, Surakarta.
Roeslan Saleh, 2006, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Angkasa, Jakarta.
Tama S. Langkun, dkk, 2014, Studi Atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Indonesia Corruption Watch, Jakarta.
Satjipto Rahadjo, 2013, Teori Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,
Balitbang Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2010, Kedudukan dan Relevansi Yurisorudensi untuk Mengurangi Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v9i1.3283
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 28 times
PDF : 14 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ria Delta, I Nengah Aryata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Indexed by :
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Muladi, 2001, Dampak Disparitas Pidana dan Usaha Mengatasinya, Alumni, Bandung.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.
Natangsa Surbakti, 2012, Filsafat Hukum, BPFH UMS, Surakarta.
Roeslan Saleh, 2006, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Angkasa, Jakarta.
Tama S. Langkun, dkk, 2014, Studi Atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Indonesia Corruption Watch, Jakarta.
Satjipto Rahadjo, 2013, Teori Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,
Balitbang Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2010, Kedudukan dan Relevansi Yurisorudensi untuk Mengurangi Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan.
Justicia Sains : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.