Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Journal of Social and Political Science is a scientific journal that publishes original articles on the latest knowledge, research, or other applied research and development in the fields issues of

international relations,

communication science,

public policy,

Management Goverment,

social development and welfare,


politics and governance.


The journal has been published regularly twice a year (February and July). The audience is academics, graduate students, practitioners and the others interested in Social and Political Issues.



Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to JISIP is independently reviewed by at least two reviewers in the form of "double-blind review". Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. In certain cases, the editor may submit an article for review to another, third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary.




Publication Frequency

Journal Published twice a year every April and October


Open Access Policy

The journal provides direct open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge exchange.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent journal archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. Lebih...


Etika Publikasi

Editor's Job

1. Fair Play: An editor at all times evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

2. Confidentiality: Editors and editorial staff may not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the appropriate authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers and publishers, as appropriate.

3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

4. Publication Decision: The editorial board journal is responsible for deciding which articles to submit to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by the legal requirements that will apply regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

5. Manuscript Review: Editors must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. Editors must organize and use peer reviews fairly and wisely. Editors should describe their peer review process in information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. Editors should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers being considered for publication by selecting those with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Reviewer's Duty

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

2. Accuracy: Any selected referee who feels ineligible to review the research reported in a manuscript or who knows that a speedy review is not possible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

3. Standard of Objectivity: Reviews must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

4. Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.

5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest arising from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions the paper is linked to.

6.Source recognition: The reviewer must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author. Any statement that the observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. The reviewer should also call the editor's attention about any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and any other published papers that have personal knowledge.



plagiarism check

Authors are required to write citations if they use other people's research results so they can pass plagiarism, check journal plagiarization that is submitted to JISIP using turnitin

plagiarism screening will be conducted by OJS Editorial Board using Grammarly Plagiarism Checker and Cross Chek plagiarism screening service powered by Turniti.com. For CrossCheck plagiarism screening service Klik disini




Jisip : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan politikik with registered number e-ISSN:2598-960X have been indexed by:




Google Scholar