Determinant Faktor Keberhasilan Penerapan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik

Edward Fazri, Trisnowati Josiah, Esti Utami Pratiwi, Aprilia Risma Ainasya, Dahlia Andesti

Abstract


This study aims to examine the factors that influence the implementation of the Performance Measurement System and its effect on the Performance of Regional Apparatus Organizations in Cilegon City. The sample in this study were officials involved in the strategic planning process at the Regional Work Equipment Organization in Cilegon City. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling and data collection was done by distributing questionnaires directly to respondents. Analysis of the research data using the Partial Least Square method.The results of this study reveal that Information, Organizational Goals and Targets and Organizational Commitment have a positive and significant effect on the implementation of the performance measurement system. In addition, this study also succeeded in finding that the Performance Measurement System had a positive and significant effect on Organizational Performance.

Keywords


Information, Organizational Goals and Objectives, External Pressure, Organizational Commitment, Performance Measurement System, Organizational Performance..

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abernethy, M.A. and Brownell, P., 1999. The Role of Budgets in Organizations Facing Strategic Change: an Exploratory Study.Accounting, Organizations and Society,24, 189-204

Akbar, Rusdi, Pilcher Robyn and Perrin Brian,2010. Performance Measurement in Indonesia: The Case of Local Government.Available at; www.afaanz.org/openconf

Bevan, G., and Hood, C., 2006. What's Measured Is What Matters: Targets And Gaming in the English Public Health Care System. Public Administration, 84,517-538.

Brignall, S. and Modell, S., 2000. An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the “New Public Sector”. Management Accounting Research, 11, 281-306.

Cavalluzzo K.S. and Ittner, C.D., 2004.Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence From Government.Accounting, Organizations Ana Society, 29, 243-267.

Dacin, T. Goodstein, J. Scott, W.R., 2002.Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum. Academy of ManagementJournal, 45(1), 45-56.

De Bruijn, H., 2002. Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope Withthe Risks of Performance Measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 578-594.

DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell.,1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160

Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Structural Equation Modeling, Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS). Edisi 2. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro: Semarang.

Greiling, Dorothea,2005. Performance measurement in the public sector: the German experience. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management Vol. 54 No. 7, 2005 pp. 551-567

Heinrich, C. J., 2002. Outcomes-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector:Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62, 712-725.

Henri, J.F., 2006. Organizational Culture and Performance Measurement Systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society,31, 77-103.

Hood, C., 1995. The ‘New Public Management’in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 93-109.

Ittner, C.D. and Larcker, D.F., 2001.Assessing Empirical Research In Management Accounting: a Value-Based Perspective. Journal of Accounting andEconomics, 32, 349-410

http://carapedia.com/pengertian_definisi_informasi_menurut_para_ahli_info504.html

http://magussudrajat.blogspot.com/2011/06/pengukuran-kinerja-sektor-publik.html

http://omusu.blogspot.com/2008/08/pembelajaran-dua-putaran.html

Julnes, P. de Lancer and Holzer, M., 2001.Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organization: an Emprirical Tudy of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708.

Kloot, L., 1999. Performance Measurement and Accountability in Victorian Local Government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12 (7),565-583

Kravchuk, R. S. and Schack, R.W., 1996.Designing Effective Performance Measurement Systems Under the Government Performance and Results Act Of 1993. Public Administration Review, 56, 348-358.

Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah,2011. Kementrian Pemberdayaan Aparatur Negara

Lapsley, I. and Wright, E., 2004. The Diffusion of Management Accounting Innovations in the Public Sector: A Research Agenda. Management Accounting Research, 15, 355-374

Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia,2003. Keputusan Kepala Lembaga Administrasi Negara Nomor 239/IX/6/8/2003 tentang Perbaikan Pedoman Penyusunan Pelaporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah [Head of State’s Administration Body’s RulingNumber 239/IX/6/8/2003 regarding Improvement of Reporting Government’s Institutions Performance Accountability Reporting]. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia.

Mahanani, Tri. 2009. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Self Efficacy, Social Desirability, dan Organizational Commitment Sebagai VaribelIntervening. Skripsi : Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Mardiasmo, 2006. Pewujudan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik Melalui Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Sarana Good Governance [Manifestation of Public Transparency and Accountability through Public Sector Accounting: a Good Governance Means]. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 2 (1), 1-17.

Norman dan Fahruzamman,2010. Implementasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (Skpd) Di Kota Bengkulu. Symposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII Purwokerto.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 73 Tahun 2009 Tentang Tatacara Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah

Rantanen,Hannu,2007. Performance measurement systems in the Finnish public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management Vol. 20 No. 5, 2007 pp. 415-433

Shields, M.D., 1995. An Empirical Analysis of Firms' Implementation Experiences with Activity-Based Costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7,148-166.

Sihaloho, F. Laurensius dan Halim, A., 2005.Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Rasional,Politik dan Kultur Organisasi Terhadap Pemanfaatan Informasi Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Daerah [Influence of Rational Factors, Organization Politic and Culture on the Usage of Local Government Performance Information].In: Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII.Solo, September 15-16, 2005.

Suranto, AW. (2005). Komunikasi Perkantoran. Cetakan Pertama. Media Wacana.Yogyakarta

Wijaya, C., Anthonius, H., & Akbar, R. (2013). The Influence of Information, Organ-izational Objectives and Targets, and External Pressure Towards The Adoption of Performance Measurement System in Public Sector. Journal of Indonesian Econ-omy & Business, 28(1)

Wang, Xiahou. (2002). Assesing Performance Measurement Impact: A study of US Lo-cal Government.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24967/ekombis.v7i2.1805

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 232 times
PDF : 151 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Edward Fazri, Esti Utami Pratiwi, Aprilia Risma Ainasya, Trisnowati Josiah, Dahlia Andesti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Ekombis Sains: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, dan Bisnis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License