Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Perwalian Harta Waris Penyandang Autis

Ditta Aulina Bakara, Erlina Bachri

Abstract


Article 28B, Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution explains that every child has the right to survival, growth, and development, as well as the right to protection from violence and discrimination. Not all children are born perfectly; some are born imperfect. One example is a child with a disability, such as autism. Nevertheless, they possess the right to receive education, healthcare, and freedom of expression. Additionally, children also have the entitlement to preserve their cultural and religious identity and engage in social, cultural, and political aspects of life without facing discrimination. Their rights go beyond just receiving protection; they also have the right to inherit assets in accordance with their entitlement. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that necessitate the inheritance of these assets and to explore how judges consider the guardianship of inheritance for individuals with autism, based on decision number 121/Pdt.P/2023/PN.Tjk. The research methodology employs a normative juridical approach, involving the examination of applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, an empirical approach is used, involving on-site observations and interviews to address research-related issues. The results of this study indicate that the factors driving the need for inheritance representation stem from the fact that the petitioner's child is a minor and has a mental disability, namely autism. This is grounded in Article 330 of the Civil Code. Consequently, the appointment of a guardian is necessary to sell one of the assets left by the deceased husband, in order to finance the medical treatment of the petitioner's child with autism or mental disability. Furthermore, in deciding this case, the judge considers that pursuant to Article 360 of the Civil Code, the appointment of a guardian is deemed necessary based on requests from blood relatives of the underage child, creditors, or other relevant parties to ensure the continuity of the trial process.

Keywords


Judge's Consideration; Heir; Child; Autism.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Rofiq. 1998. Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.

Anggalana. 2017. Rangkaian Bunga Rampai Hak Asasi Manusia. AURA.

Diana Anisya Fitri Suhartono, dkk. 2022. Sistem Pewarisan Menurut Hukum Perdata, Vol. 1. Nomor. 3.

Dio Ashar, Bestha Inatsan Ashila, dan Gita Nadia Pramesa. 2019. Panduan Penanganan Perkara Penyandang Disabilitas Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. (Jakarta: MaPPI FHUI).

Ismail Shaleh. 2018. “Implementasi Pemenuhan Hak Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Ketenagakerjaan Di Semarang,â€. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 20. Nomor. 1.

Muhammad Amin Summa. 2004. Hukum Keluarga Islam di Dunia Islam. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Muhammad Dzaki. 2022. Tanggung Jawab Orang Tua Sebagai Wali Dalam Pengurusan Harta Waris Anak Dibawah Umur Berdasarkan Hukum Islam. Vol. 3. Nomor. 6.

Pasal 1 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang No.8 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyandang Disabilitas.

Sudarso. 1991. Hukum Keluarga Nasional. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Sunarto Ady Wibowo. 2004. “Perwalian†Menurut KUHPerdata dan Undang-Undang . Nomor 1 Tahun 1974.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v8i2.2456

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 91 times
PDF : 40 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ditta Aulina Bakara, Erlina - Bachri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexed by :

GS    Garuda    GS    ISSN

Dimensions    Journal Stories

Creative Commons License
Justicia Sains : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

hit counter View My Stats