Legalitas Dan Validitas Visum Et Repertum Yang Dikeluarkan Oleh Dokter Non-Forensik: Perspektif Medikolegal Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana

Leli Yanita, M Fakih, Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah

Abstract


Visum et repertum is an important piece of evidence in the criminal justice process that serves to bridge the gap between the medical and legal worlds. In practice, the limited number of forensic expert doctors causes the visum et repertum to be issued by general practitioners or doctors who are not forensic experts. This raises a debate regarding the legality and validity of the visum in the process of proving a criminal offense. This paper aims to analyze the legal basis and validity of a visum et repertum made by a doctor who is not a forensic expert from a medicolegal perspective. The method used is the approach of legislation, scientific literature, and case studies. The results of the study show that in order to guarantee fair legal protection for doctors in the practice of national health services. The legality of general practitioners has the authority to make a visum et repertum in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code and Permenkes, as long as it is carried out based on their professional competence. However, in terms of medicolegal validity, a medical report made by a doctor who is not a forensic expert has the potential to cause weaknesses in evidence if it is not prepared with adequate forensic standards. The novelty of this paper lies in emphasizing the importance of standardizing medical-legal training for non-forensic doctors as a medium-term solution to the limited number of forensic experts in the criminal justice system in Indonesia.]

Keywords


Visum et Repertum; Doctor not a Forensic Expert; Legality; Validity; Medikolegal; Criminal Evidence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alim, D. P., Hevira, L., Purwanti, T., Mujahid, E. H., Sriwaty, I., Handayani, V. W., ... & Amin, A. (2023). Peran Forensik di Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu.

Alim, D. P., Hevira, L., Purwanti, T., Mujahid, E. H., Sriwaty, I., Handayani, V. W., ... & Amin, A. (2023). Peran Forensik di Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu.

Anindita, S. R., Kiling, C. F., Wungkana, W., & Winatha, B. W. (2024). Penentuan Derajat Perlukaan pada Visum et Repertum Korban Hidup: Tantangan dan Solusi bagi Dokter Umum. Proceeding Masyarakat Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 1(01), 371- 380.

Ardhyan, Y. (2017). Analasis Atas Permintaan Penyidik Untuk Dilakukannya Visum Et Repertum Menurut KUHAP. Lex Administratum, 5(2).

Christina, O. K. F., Elias, R. F., & Bawole, H. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Atas Penggunaan Visum Et Repertum Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Lex Administratum, 12(3).

Dilla Haryanti, S. H. (2013). Peranan Visum Et Refertum Sebagai Salah Satu Alat Bukti Di Persidangan Dalam Tindak Pidana Perkosaan. CONSTITUTUM, 13(1).

Fatkhur Rohman. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Visum Et Repertum Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana”. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 4 No.3 (2015): 289-302.

Habiburrahman, M., & Yudhistira, A. (2021). Autopsi Virtual (Virtopsy): Tinjauan Etik, Bioetika, Sosial, Budaya, Agama, dan Medikolegal. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 5(1), 1

Iriyanto, G. (2025). Tinjuan Yuridis Tentang Visum Et Repertum Dokter Dalam Menggungkap Tindak Pidana Kasus Ronald Tanur: Studi Kasus Perkara Pidana Nomor: 1466K/PID/2024. Lex Et Lustitia, 2(1), 18-29.

Krisnalita, L. Y. (2021). Euthanasia dalam hukum pidana Indonesia dan kode etik kedokteran. Binamulia Hukum, 10(2), 171-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v10i2.386

Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008

Pardede, B. A. M., Simamora, A. Y., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Kekuatan Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(2), 2236-2245.

Salim, D. N., Renggong, R., & Madiong, B. (2020). Efektivitas Dokter Kepolisian Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 2(2), 83-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v2i2.477

Sihombing, I., & Siregar, F. R. (2023). Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4), 9366-9403.

Werembinan, P. C., & Nugroho, W. C. (2024). Keabsahan Visum Et Repertum dan Visum Psikiatrikum sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan. Journal Evidence Of Law, 3(3), 284-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.772

Yakub, A. O., Thalib, H., & Razak, A. (2024). Optimalisasi Fungsi Penuntutan Jaksa Kasus Pencabulan Anak Dibawah Umur. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 1383- 1398.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24967/vt.v8i2.4389

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 196 times
PDF : 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Viva Themis : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexed by :

GS  ISSN   Garuda    Journal Stories

Dimensions

Creative Commons License
Viva Themis : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.