THE INFLUENCE OF WORKING DISCIPLINE AND JOB DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEE IN REGIONAL REVENUE OFFICE
Rafian Joni
Abstract
The hypothesis in this study is that there is an influence of work discipline and job descriptions both partially and simultaneously on employee performance.The population in this research were 47 employees, the sample used in this study amounted to 46 employees. Data collection techniques include observation, documentation and questionnaires. Methods of data analysis using qualitative and quantitative approaches with the help of statistical tools SPSS version 21.0 include the calculation of the validity test, reliability test, regression test and the coefficient of determination test.The results of testing the hypothesis of the influence of work discipline on performance partially shows that work discipline has a positive influence on performance with a contribution of 73.9%. Other partial Hypothesis Testing, obtained job description results have a positive influence on performance with a contribution of 62.9%. Simultaneous hypothesis testing shows that work discipline and job descriptions together have a positive influence on performance with a contribution of 74.1%, while the remaining 25.9% is a variation of other variables not examined.
References
Abidin, Fudin Zainal. 2013. Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Rekatama Putra Gegana Bandung. Repository. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Winaya Mukti Bandung.
Algifari. 2010. Statistika Induktif untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis, edisi 2, AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2012, Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Cascio. 2013. Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta : PT. Ganudra Pustaka Utama.
Davis, Keith. Newstrom. 2010. Perilaku dalam Organisasi, Edisi ketujuh, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Ferdinand, Augusty. 2010. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Edisi 2. BP Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Ghozali, Imam. 2010. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., dan Donnelly, J.Jr. 2010. Organisasi dan Manajemen: Perilaku, Sruktur, dan Proses. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Handoko, T. Hani. 2010. Manajemen Edisi 2. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Hasibuan, Malayu. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Heneman, Schwab. 2012. Personnel/Human Resource Management (Terjemahan). Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Keputusan MENPAN nomor 04/1991 tentang Pemasyarakatan Budaya Kerja Kementerian PAN, 2002, Pedoman Pengembangan Budaya Kerja Aparatur. Negara.
Luthans, Fred, 2011. Perilaku Organisasi, edisi sepuluh. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi. Mas’ud, Fuad. 2014. Survai Diagnosis Organisasional, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24967/saburaiijssd.v4i2.1110
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1103 times
PDF : 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Saburai International Journal of Social Sciences and Development
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa
  
Rafian JoniAbstract
The hypothesis in this study is that there is an influence of work discipline and job descriptions both partially and simultaneously on employee performance.The population in this research were 47 employees, the sample used in this study amounted to 46 employees. Data collection techniques include observation, documentation and questionnaires. Methods of data analysis using qualitative and quantitative approaches with the help of statistical tools SPSS version 21.0 include the calculation of the validity test, reliability test, regression test and the coefficient of determination test.The results of testing the hypothesis of the influence of work discipline on performance partially shows that work discipline has a positive influence on performance with a contribution of 73.9%. Other partial Hypothesis Testing, obtained job description results have a positive influence on performance with a contribution of 62.9%. Simultaneous hypothesis testing shows that work discipline and job descriptions together have a positive influence on performance with a contribution of 74.1%, while the remaining 25.9% is a variation of other variables not examined.
References
Abidin, Fudin Zainal. 2013. Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Rekatama Putra Gegana Bandung. Repository. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Winaya Mukti Bandung.
Algifari. 2010. Statistika Induktif untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis, edisi 2, AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2012, Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Cascio. 2013. Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta : PT. Ganudra Pustaka Utama.
Davis, Keith. Newstrom. 2010. Perilaku dalam Organisasi, Edisi ketujuh, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Ferdinand, Augusty. 2010. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Edisi 2. BP Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Ghozali, Imam. 2010. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., dan Donnelly, J.Jr. 2010. Organisasi dan Manajemen: Perilaku, Sruktur, dan Proses. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Handoko, T. Hani. 2010. Manajemen Edisi 2. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Hasibuan, Malayu. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Heneman, Schwab. 2012. Personnel/Human Resource Management (Terjemahan). Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Keputusan MENPAN nomor 04/1991 tentang Pemasyarakatan Budaya Kerja Kementerian PAN, 2002, Pedoman Pengembangan Budaya Kerja Aparatur. Negara.
Luthans, Fred, 2011. Perilaku Organisasi, edisi sepuluh. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi. Mas’ud, Fuad. 2014. Survai Diagnosis Organisasional, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang