Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai, specifically focuses on the main issues in the development of educational and learning innovations

Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai with area coverage:

1. Education in the broadest sense

2. Specific education (certain field of study)

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editor will be selected through a preliminary review by the Editorial Board. Articles that are considered eligible will be sent to reviewers and the next selection process using Double Blind Peer Review. Results of review articles will be returned to the author for revision. The review process takes up to four weeks. Every article that entry will be judged on aspects of science and methodology. a reviewer in collaboration with Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai consists of experts in the fields of education. The reviewers are experts in the field who have experience working as a reviewer for several journals in both the national and international scale.

The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully between 1 - 2 months. Please notice that may be paper submissions to Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai, the duration of the review process can be up to 2 months.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai  strives for the constant availability of published articles. With this in mind, Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai content is continually archived and preserved its published articles in the library of Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai Lampung.

 

Publication Frequency

Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai published two times a year, in Maret dan September

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractuce Statement

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

COPE

Publication Ethics and Misconducts

Ensiklopediais a peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal as well as allegations of research misconduct, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer,­ and the publisher (Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai Lampung). This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Ensiklopedia is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is, therefore, important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai through LPPM Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai as the publisher of Ensiklopedia takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Allegations of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing the article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article.

The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and an assessment of whether the allegation is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest.

If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the coauthors, is requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be obtained. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article are sufficient.

Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on the evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and retractions, the Ensiklopedia journal will continue to fulfill the responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record.

Publication decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.

The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Complaints and Appeals

The Ensiklopedia journal will have a clear procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board, or Publisher. The complaints will be clarified to respected personal concerning the case of a complaint. The scope of complaints includes anything related to the journal business process, i.e., editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editor/reviewer, peer-review manipulation, etc. The complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guidelines.

Post-publication discussions

Ensiklopedia journal allows debate post publication either on its site, through letters to the editor, or on an external moderated site.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Data Sharing Policies

Ensiklopedia is committed to a more open research landscape, facilitating faster and more effective research discovery by enabling reproducibility and verification of data, methodology and reporting standards. We encourage authors of articles published in our journals to share their research data including, but not limited to: raw data, processed data, software, algorithms, protocols, methods, materials.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Plagiarism Check

Plagiarism screening will be conducted by OJS Editorial Board using Grammarly Plagiarism Checker and CrossCheck plagiarism screening service powered by Turnitin.Com.

 

Article Processing Charges (APCs) & Article Submission Charges

Every manuscript sent to Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pendidikan Saburai is free of charge. This includes peer-review, editing, publishing, maintaining and archiving.

 

Indexing

Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Saburai, with registered number p-ISSN: 2808-1072 (print), e-ISSN: 2808-1153 (online) have been indexed on :
1. Crossref;
2. Google Scholar;
3. RoaD;
4. Dimensions;
5. Garuda;
6. Moraref;
7. DRJI: Directory of Research Journals Indexing;
8. Scilit;
9. Citefactor;

 

Withdrawal of Manuscript

The author is not allowed to withdraw submitted or published manuscripts (unless there are compelling reasons), because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and reviewers spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscripts and works invested by the publisher.

If the author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript the author will be asked to submit an "Article withdrawal Form" signed by all authors (or) the corresponding author of the manuscript stating the reasons for manuscript withdrawal. Authors must not assume that their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification to this effect from the editorial office. Please contact ensiklopediasaburai@gmail.com for the "Article withdrawal Form".

However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted or published manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal.

 

Direct Marketing

In promoting the journal and the results of research, the journal conducts direct marketing activities, including solicitation of manuscripts that are conducted on behalf of the journal, appropriate, well-targeted, and unobtrusive. All information provided about the publisher or journal is expected to be truthful and not misleading for readers or authors.

 

Revenue Sources

Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Saburai is an open-access journal, which is published in both online and print versions. Source of income from institutional support. Source of income which is utilized in maintaining the administrative and the print cost. Also, a very non-significant part of revenue also comes from the subscription.



https://daftarpanen77.web.fc2.com/ https://loginpanen77.web.fc2.com/ https://linkalternatifpanen77.web.fc2.com/ https://daftargudang138.web.fc2.com/ https://logingudang138.web.fc2.com/ https://linkalternatifgudang138.web.fc2.com/